Freedom News

Obama, the Nobel peace prize & World War 3

Submitted by CFT on Fri, 10/16/2009 - 01:52
in

The machine grinds onward: Here is a great insight into Obama's moral high ground.

Obama: waging War on Truth

Core of corruption coming

Submitted by CFT on Mon, 10/12/2009 - 22:34
in

We are change Colorado speak out on corruption and how to end it...

Alinsky Beck Satan and Me

Submitted by CFT on Fri, 10/09/2009 - 20:34
in
This article, written by David Horowitz is copied partly from http://newsrealblog.com/2009/08/16/alinsky-beck-satan-and-me .
While we support David's views for the most part, please note that there are some comments inserted in the same format as this paragraph for easy distinction.

satan1

912 Event Ignored by Press

Submitted by CFT on Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:38
in

Mainstream press misrepresented the 912 event in DC in many ways. They reported the number of demonstrators as "hundreds".

Charlie Sheen gives Obama 911 truth

Submitted by CFT on Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:41
in

Reported by Charlie Sheen

Infowars

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

charlie sheen

UN Agenda 21 Local New World Order

Submitted by CFT on Tue, 09/08/2009 - 14:35
in

Attorney Michael Shaw explains UN AGENDA 21 in your home county

Pastor abused tased by border patrol

Submitted by CFT on Mon, 09/07/2009 - 03:45
in
Pastor Steven Anderson: Tased, wounded, abused for no reason!

Manning Revolution a patriotic word

Submitted by CFT on Sun, 09/06/2009 - 06:23
in
Reverend James Manning calls for revolution; condemns atheists

The Fed's Interesting Week

Submitted by CFT on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 14:31
in
The Fed's Interesting Week By Ron Paul
Published 09/01/09

Would martial law be legal?

Submitted by CFT on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 07:30
in

Martial Law
"Martial Law" enacted in the U.S. in response to a staged "Terrorist Threat", would be illegal.

The following is an excerpt from A PRIMER ON “MARTIAL LAW”
By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.

August 31, 2009

http://NewsWithViews.com
It is difficult these days not to come upon some pessimistic patriotic commentator expressing the fear that something called “martial law” may soon be imposed on this country, as the General Government’s response to a new “terrorist attack”, or to the economic and social chaos arising out of a collapse of the monetary and banking systems, or to some other dire event that frightens hapless Americans into trading a sure and certain loss of their liberties for a dollop of conjectural safety.
An optimistic patriot might scoff at such fears. But both pessimists and optimists typically share the same implicit first premise: namely, that the form of “martial law” they have in mind is legitimate. Most of the time, this is a rather glaring and dangerous error.

In legal analysis, definitions of terms make all the difference. And “martial law” can be defined in at least four ways:

·First, the term could denote the law that Congress may enact for governance of the Armed Forces and “the Militia of the several States”.

Read the full article »

Syndicate content